Jordanian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,350,392 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 35.2 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $72,093, a difference of 51.7%), median household income ($91,794 compared to $62,575, a difference of 46.7%), and wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($58,500 compared to $50,547, a difference of 15.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $44,356, a difference of 16.8%), and median earnings ($49,632 compared to $38,949, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 91.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 88.2%), and single female poverty (18.8% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 79.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 39.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 40.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 81.9%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 43.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 63.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.4%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 34.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 113.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 109.2%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 108.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.73%), 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 84.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 74.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.8%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.3%).