Icelander vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,138,610 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.123% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 1,123.3 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $72,093, a difference of 41.8%), wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 40.8%), and median household income ($85,797 compared to $62,575, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $50,547, a difference of 9.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $44,356, a difference of 15.5%), and median earnings ($46,916 compared to $38,949, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 88.2%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 83.9%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 21.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 36.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 38.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 77.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 54.5%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 53.6%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 50.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 115.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 114.2%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 95.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 64.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 60.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.5%).