White/Caucasian vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Houma
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in White/Caucasian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,676,285 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 3.8 Houma.
White/Caucasian vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $72,093, a difference of 36.1%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 35.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $44,822, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $50,547, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $44,356, a difference of 13.5%), and median earnings ($45,197 compared to $38,949, a difference of 16.0%).
Income Metric | White/Caucasian | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,180 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Poor $99,800 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,029 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,197 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,925 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,531 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,336 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,668 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,091 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,847 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.5% | Tragic 38.7% |
White/Caucasian vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 66.7%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 61.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 25.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 29.5%).
Poverty Metric | White/Caucasian | Houma |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.2% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 16.5% |
White/Caucasian vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 69.0%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 41.7%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.5%).
Unemployment Metric | White/Caucasian | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.9% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
White/Caucasian vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | White/Caucasian | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.5% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 74.1% |
White/Caucasian vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 40.0%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.98%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | White/Caucasian | Houma |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.1% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 46.6% |
White/Caucasian vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 62.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 49.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | White/Caucasian | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.1% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.8% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
White/Caucasian vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 83.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 83.3%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 74.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | White/Caucasian | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.3% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.8% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.1% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.2% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.0% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.6% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 44.2% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.3% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 0.96% |
White/Caucasian vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 48.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 46.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.4%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.9%).
Disability Metric | White/Caucasian | Houma |
Disability | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.3% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |