Estonian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,130,627 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Estonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Estonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Estonians corresponds to an increase of 46.9 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,220 compared to $72,093, a difference of 58.4%), per capita income ($51,875 compared to $32,996, a difference of 57.2%), and median family income ($118,013 compared to $76,188, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,523 compared to $44,356, a difference of 16.2%), median male earnings ($61,710 compared to $50,547, a difference of 22.1%), and median earnings ($51,772 compared to $38,949, a difference of 32.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 94.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 86.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 26.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 43.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 49.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 75.9%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 38.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 59.5%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.4%), family households (62.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and currently married (48.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 168.7%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 163.9%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 137.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 75.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 66.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 23.2%).