Maltese vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Maltese
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Maltese
Houma
9,141
SOCIAL INDEX
88.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
30th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Maltese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,906,989 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Maltese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.459. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Maltese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Maltese corresponds to an increase of 40.8 Houma.
Maltese vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Maltese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,754 compared to $72,093, a difference of 59.2%), median household income ($97,015 compared to $62,575, a difference of 55.0%), and median family income ($115,862 compared to $76,188, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,735 compared to $44,356, a difference of 21.1%), median male earnings ($62,953 compared to $50,547, a difference of 24.5%), and wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 34.5%).
Income Metric | Maltese | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,640 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,862 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,015 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,526 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,953 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,357 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,735 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $110,064 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,754 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,027 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Tragic 38.7% |
Maltese vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Maltese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 108.3%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 105.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 99.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 49.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 56.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 56.6%).
Poverty Metric | Maltese | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.6% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.7% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.6% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.9% | Tragic 16.5% |
Maltese vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Maltese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 73.3%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Maltese | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Maltese vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Maltese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Maltese | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.3% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 74.1% |
Maltese vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Maltese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 67.3%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 52.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.70%), family households (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Maltese | Houma |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.2% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 46.6% |
Maltese vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Maltese | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.0% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Maltese vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Maltese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 127.2%), master's degree (17.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 118.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 114.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Maltese | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.3% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.5% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.4% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.9% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 0.96% |
Maltese vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 76.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 71.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 18.6%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 22.5%).
Disability Metric | Maltese | Houma |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.8% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 3.0% |