Alsatian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,271,930 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.990% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 990.3 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 56.7%), per capita income ($47,284 compared to $32,996, a difference of 43.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,435 compared to $72,093, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,380 compared to $50,547, a difference of 9.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $44,356, a difference of 11.1%), and median earnings ($47,023 compared to $38,949, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 54.2%), single male poverty (15.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 53.9%), and family poverty (9.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 7.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 56.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 51.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 37.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.1%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.8% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.41%), currently married (45.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 134.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 124.1%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 113.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.75%), 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 58.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.4%).