Creek vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,536,590 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.668. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.235% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 234.8 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 42.5%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $44,822, a difference of 15.9%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $30,343, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($39,648 compared to $38,949, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $44,356, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $77,044, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Houma communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 40.5%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 39.3%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 23.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.64%), currently married (46.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 47.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 46.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 70.0%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 40.5%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 31.9%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and male disability (15.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.2%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.4%).