Immigrants from Lithuania vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,186,286 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.121% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to a decrease of 121.1 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $72,093, a difference of 58.6%), per capita income ($51,361 compared to $32,996, a difference of 55.7%), and median family income ($118,053 compared to $76,188, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $44,356, a difference of 24.1%), median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $50,547, a difference of 25.3%), and wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 35.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 104.7%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 102.4%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 102.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 47.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 47.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 50.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 77.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 45.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 67.8%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.79%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 151.5%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 133.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 130.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 95.0%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 79.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.7%).