Immigrants from Russia vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,891,251 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 49.3 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $32,996, a difference of 57.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $72,093, a difference of 57.0%), and median household income ($96,378 compared to $62,575, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $50,547, a difference of 25.3%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $44,356, a difference of 26.0%), and median earnings ($53,457 compared to $38,949, a difference of 37.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 97.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 86.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 78.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 70.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 71.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 49.3%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.46%), family households (63.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 31.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 172.5%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 163.0%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 145.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.68%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 89.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 79.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 73.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 19.5%).