Ecuadorian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,472,698 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.096. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 10.0 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 68.7%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $62,575, a difference of 31.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $72,093, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $50,547, a difference of 2.1%), median earnings ($45,214 compared to $38,949, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $77,044, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 87.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 62.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 58.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 45.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 39.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 98.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 29.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 76.8%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 76.8%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 75.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 70.7%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 18.5%).