Brazilian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,393,436 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 24.6 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $72,093, a difference of 44.8%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 44.6%), and median household income ($88,934 compared to $62,575, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $50,547, a difference of 12.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $44,356, a difference of 22.5%), and median earnings ($48,356 compared to $38,949, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 99.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 74.1%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 73.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 65.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 37.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 53.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.14%), currently married (46.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (63.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 125.1%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 116.8%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 109.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.63%), 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and 6th grade (96.9% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 78.1%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 63.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.2%).