Scandinavian vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Houma

Good
Tragic
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,972,491 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Houma.
Scandinavian Integration in Houma Communities

Scandinavian vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $72,093, a difference of 42.8%), median household income ($86,073 compared to $62,575, a difference of 37.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $44,822, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,527 compared to $50,547, a difference of 9.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $44,356, a difference of 18.7%), and median earnings ($46,433 compared to $38,949, a difference of 19.2%).
Scandinavian vs Houma Income
Income MetricScandinavianHouma
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Tragic
38.7%

Scandinavian vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 91.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 82.1%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 45.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 48.9%).
Scandinavian vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianHouma
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
16.5%

Scandinavian vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 84.6%), male unemployment (4.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 51.1%), and unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.7%).
Scandinavian vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianHouma
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.8%

Scandinavian vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.1%).
Scandinavian vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
74.1%

Scandinavian vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 56.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Scandinavian vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianHouma
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
46.6%

Scandinavian vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 63.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 62.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.0%).
Scandinavian vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianHouma
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
4.9%

Scandinavian vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 91.3%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 91.2%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 85.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Scandinavian vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianHouma
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
0.96%

Scandinavian vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 58.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 57.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.8%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 20.4%).
Scandinavian vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianHouma
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%