Polish vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,358,750 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Polish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Poles within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Poles corresponds to an increase of 12.3 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Polish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,952 compared to $72,093, a difference of 47.0%), median family income ($108,507 compared to $76,188, a difference of 42.4%), and median household income ($88,472 compared to $62,575, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($58,139 compared to $50,547, a difference of 15.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,407 compared to $44,356, a difference of 18.1%), and median earnings ($48,659 compared to $38,949, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Polish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 96.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 82.5%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 79.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 39.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 45.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 49.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Polish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 77.5%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 43.7%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Polish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Polish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 51.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 42.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.09 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Polish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 35.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Polish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 105.8%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 99.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 98.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Polish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 65.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 64.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.4%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.4%).