Lumbee vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,021,021 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.100% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 100.4 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 81.2%), householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $44,356, a difference of 28.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $77,044, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($36,876 compared to $38,949, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $30,343, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $44,822, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Houma communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 46.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (30.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 43.0%), and receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.62%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father poverty (28.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 47.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 46.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.4%), male unemployment (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (70.6% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.8%), currently married (39.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and married-couple households (39.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.5%), family households (63.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 78.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 84.0%), associate's degree (34.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and college, 1 year or more (48.9% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.74%).