Immigrants from Belarus vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,174,024 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 56.1 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,430 compared to $72,093, a difference of 54.6%), per capita income ($50,303 compared to $32,996, a difference of 52.4%), and median household income ($94,399 compared to $62,575, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $50,547, a difference of 24.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $44,356, a difference of 25.7%), and median earnings ($53,043 compared to $38,949, a difference of 36.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 98.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 89.9%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 68.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 48.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 81.6%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.2%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.18%), family households (63.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 149.6%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 138.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 133.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.62%), 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 92.5%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 82.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 80.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.9%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 19.3%).