Central American Indian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,748,419 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.109% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 108.9 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 70.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $72,093, a difference of 20.3%), and median household income ($74,847 compared to $62,575, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,474 compared to $38,949, a difference of 6.5%), median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $50,547, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $77,044, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 35.9%), single female poverty (25.5% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 32.8%), and married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 19.5%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.82%), married-couple households (43.8% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 63.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 59.5%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 45.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 43.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.9%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 11.2%).