Malaysian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,184,463 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 9.9 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 54.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $72,093, a difference of 31.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $44,822, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $50,547, a difference of 0.44%), median earnings ($43,844 compared to $38,949, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,291 compared to $77,044, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 85.9%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 79.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 65.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 45.8%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 37.4%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.24%), currently married (45.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 56.0%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 48.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 53.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.1%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 55.3%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 50.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.6%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.6%).