Immigrants from Chile vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,114,058 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 7.1 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 50.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $72,093, a difference of 43.4%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $62,575, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $50,547, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $44,356, a difference of 18.2%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $38,949, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 94.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 74.1%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 76.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 40.0%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 49.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.42%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 137.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 119.6%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 111.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.50%), 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and 5th grade (97.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 84.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 67.8%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.1%).