Luxembourger vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,018,801 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.184% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 183.5 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $72,093, a difference of 43.6%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 40.9%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $76,188, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $50,547, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $44,356, a difference of 13.6%), and median earnings ($47,640 compared to $38,949, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 102.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 89.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 88.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 25.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 50.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 50.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 81.9%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 56.7%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 58.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 42.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.5%), family households (63.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 114.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 108.3%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 102.2%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 93.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Houma communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 77.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 76.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.6%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.6%).