Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Malaysia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Malaysia

Ecuadorians

Good
Poor
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Malaysia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,263,698 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.223% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 223.2 Ecuadorians.
Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($115,880 compared to $95,114, a difference of 21.8%), median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $51,596, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $93,739, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $53,911, a difference of 0.50%), median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $39,117, a difference of 12.1%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.8%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,983
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,880
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,292
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,514
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,121
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,835
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,179
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,650
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,796
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,497
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
22.9%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 43.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 27.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.5%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaEcuadorian
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.0%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.9%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 30.4%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.1%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaEcuadorian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.4%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.5%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.75%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.3%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
82.3%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.2%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 21.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.47%), family households (64.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaEcuadorian
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 67.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 10.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 30.1%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.5%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.7%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
4.5%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.7%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.7%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.65%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.3%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.3%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.5%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.0%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.9%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.33%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaEcuadorian
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.4%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%