Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yugoslavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yugoslavians

Ecuadorians

Good
Poor
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Yugoslavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,798,550 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Yugoslavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yugoslavians corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Ecuadorians.
Yugoslavian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.6%), householder income over 65 years ($58,243 compared to $54,958, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,028 compared to $53,911, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($82,186 compared to $82,070, a difference of 0.14%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,368 compared to $91,574, a difference of 0.23%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $45,214, a difference of 1.4%).
Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricYugoslavianEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Fair
$42,792
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,119
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,186
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,846
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,967
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,573
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,028
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,368
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$97,558
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,243
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
22.9%

Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 40.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 40.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricYugoslavianEcuadorian
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Good
10.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.2%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.8%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.2%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.9%

Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 31.5%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.3%).
Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYugoslavianEcuadorian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%

Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 33.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.82%).
Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYugoslavianEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.8%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
82.3%

Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.2%), currently married (47.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (63.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYugoslavianEcuadorian
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.8%
Poor
33.3%

Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 153.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 16.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.1%).
Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYugoslavianEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Tragic
4.5%

Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 60.5%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and college, under 1 year (65.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricYugoslavianEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.7%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.2%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.1%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.2%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 30.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Yugoslavian vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricYugoslavianEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%