Scotch-Irish vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,655,504 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 55.4 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 24.3%), householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $53,911, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $54,958, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($44,924 compared to $45,214, a difference of 0.64%), median household income ($80,972 compared to $82,070, a difference of 1.4%), and per capita income ($42,563 compared to $41,958, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 47.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 45.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 2.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.9%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 32.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.0%), currently married (48.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.90%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 234.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 66.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 19.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 45.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 103.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and college, under 1 year (65.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 56.4%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 52.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.13%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.0%).