Slavic vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,691,625 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.442% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 442.2 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $54,958, a difference of 12.3%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $95,114, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $39,117, a difference of 1.3%), median earnings ($47,470 compared to $45,214, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $91,574, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 43.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.7%), currently married (48.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 154.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 45.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 79.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.5%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.3%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.9%).