Serbian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Serbians

Ecuadorians

Excellent
Poor
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Serbian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,748,914 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Serbian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.022. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Serbians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Serbians corresponds to an increase of 7.9 Ecuadorians.
Serbian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Serbian vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Serbian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 20.9%), median family income ($107,157 compared to $95,114, a difference of 12.7%), and median male earnings ($57,975 compared to $51,596, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,539 compared to $39,117, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,106 compared to $53,911, a difference of 5.5%), and median household income ($87,572 compared to $82,070, a difference of 6.7%).
Serbian vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricSerbianEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,551
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,157
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,572
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,677
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,975
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,539
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,106
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,320
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,522
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,087
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
22.9%

Serbian vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Serbian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 51.3%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 44.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.070%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.83%).
Serbian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricSerbianEcuadorian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Average
16.4%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.6%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.9%

Serbian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Serbian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.7%).
Serbian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSerbianEcuadorian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%

Serbian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Serbian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Serbian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSerbianEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.5%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
82.3%

Serbian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Serbian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.7%), currently married (47.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (63.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.5%).
Serbian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSerbianEcuadorian
Family Households
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Poor
33.3%

Serbian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Serbian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 141.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 16.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 33.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.2%).
Serbian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSerbianEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Tragic
4.5%

Serbian vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Serbian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 76.8%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.5%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Serbian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricSerbianEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.4%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.1%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Serbian vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Serbian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.95%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Serbian vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricSerbianEcuadorian
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Poor
11.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%