Burmese vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,200,533 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($123,369 compared to $95,114, a difference of 29.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $93,739, a difference of 29.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $54,958, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $53,911, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $39,117, a difference of 14.8%), and median earnings ($54,559 compared to $45,214, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 72.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 50.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 26.0%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.1%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 26.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 135.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 52.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 16.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 46.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 80.6%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 56.7%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.3%).