Australian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,592,405 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 31.2 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($118,440 compared to $95,114, a difference of 24.5%), per capita income ($52,074 compared to $41,958, a difference of 24.1%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $53,911, a difference of 0.32%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $39,117, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($52,294 compared to $45,214, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 54.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 51.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.2%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (62.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 125.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 46.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 43.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 82.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.3%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 26.2%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.67%).