Czechoslovakian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Ecuadorians
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 241,905,999 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.456% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 455.8 Ecuadorians.
Czechoslovakian vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 23.1%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $54,958, a difference of 10.2%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $95,114, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $39,117, a difference of 0.98%), median earnings ($46,658 compared to $45,214, a difference of 3.2%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $82,070, a difference of 3.5%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 49.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 48.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.9% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 33.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.44%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.3%), currently married (48.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.51%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Poor 33.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 190.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 59.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 18.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 42.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 82.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and college, under 1 year (65.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.5%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |