Mongolian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,944,495 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.196% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to a decrease of 195.9 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($114,553 compared to $95,114, a difference of 20.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $93,739, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $54,958, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $53,911, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $39,117, a difference of 8.8%), and median earnings ($51,038 compared to $45,214, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 42.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.7%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.3%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.3%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.77%), family households (62.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 73.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 11.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 25.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 89.1%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 56.5%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.4%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.0%).