Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lumbee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lumbee

Ecuadorians

Poor
Poor
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Lumbee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,785,297 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.706. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Ecuadorians.
Lumbee Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $53,911, a difference of 55.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $91,574, a difference of 51.8%), and median household income ($54,644 compared to $82,070, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $39,117, a difference of 20.4%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $45,214, a difference of 22.6%).
Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricLumbeeEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,845
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Tragic
$68,679
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Tragic
$54,644
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,876
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,715
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,500
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$34,584
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$60,305
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$65,113
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$40,550
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.3%
Exceptional
22.9%

Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (25.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 101.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (26.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 83.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 25.4%), married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 29.4%).
Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricLumbeeEcuadorian
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
20.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.9%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
25.2%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
33.0%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
28.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
14.9%

Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 74.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 56.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLumbeeEcuadorian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.5%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.8%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.5%

Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (70.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 8.8%).
Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLumbeeEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.8%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.6%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
65.5%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
78.3%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.3%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.0%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.6%
Tragic
82.3%

Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.080%), family households (63.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLumbeeEcuadorian
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.6%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.8%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
48.2%
Poor
33.3%

Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 120.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 96.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 64.7%).
Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLumbeeEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.3%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.9%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.1%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
4.5%

Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 95.2%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 59.2%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (88.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.74%), 10th grade (91.7% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricLumbeeEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.2%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.9%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.8%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.3%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 65.2%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 63.7%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.1%).
Lumbee vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricLumbeeEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.7%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.2%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.1%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
9.5%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%