Comanche vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Ecuadorians
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,612,866 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.366. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 6.3 Ecuadorians.
Comanche vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $53,911, a difference of 13.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $91,574, a difference of 11.5%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $82,070, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $54,958, a difference of 0.070%), median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $51,596, a difference of 7.0%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $95,114, a difference of 7.4%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Comanche vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 28.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.9% |
Comanche vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Comanche vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 82.3% |
Comanche vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.2%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.66%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Comanche vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 122.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 52.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Comanche vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 43.4%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.4% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Comanche vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 57.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.4%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |