Lithuanian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Lithuanians
Ecuadorians
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Lithuanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,039,360 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.493. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.209% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 208.7 Ecuadorians.
Lithuanian vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 25.5%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $95,114, a difference of 21.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $93,739, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $53,911, a difference of 0.67%), median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $39,117, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($50,991 compared to $45,214, a difference of 12.8%).
Income Metric | Lithuanian | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,448 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,395 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,852 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,991 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,228 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,108 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,552 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,223 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,484 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,209 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Lithuanian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 64.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 54.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.3%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and single father poverty (17.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.8%).
Poverty Metric | Lithuanian | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 14.9% |
Lithuanian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Lithuanian | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.9% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Lithuanian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 28.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Lithuanian | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.0% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 82.3% |
Lithuanian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), family households (64.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Lithuanian | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Fair 64.0% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.6% | Poor 33.3% |
Lithuanian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 169.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 43.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 38.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Lithuanian | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.7% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.2% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Lithuanian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 105.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.8%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Lithuanian | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.9% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.8% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.2% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Lithuanian vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 42.7%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Lithuanian | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |