Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Macedonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Macedonians

Ecuadorians

Excellent
Poor
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Macedonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,717,760 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Macedonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Macedonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Macedonians corresponds to a decrease of 23.5 Ecuadorians.
Macedonian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 24.7%), median male earnings ($59,522 compared to $51,596, a difference of 15.4%), and median family income ($109,668 compared to $95,114, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,563 compared to $53,911, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($41,286 compared to $39,117, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($49,893 compared to $45,214, a difference of 10.3%).
Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricMacedonianEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,573
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,668
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,761
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,893
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,522
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,286
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,563
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,882
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$107,074
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,564
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
22.9%

Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 50.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.0%).
Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricMacedonianEcuadorian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.9%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
14.9%

Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.1%).
Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMacedonianEcuadorian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.6%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%

Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMacedonianEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.8%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.7%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
82.3%

Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.4%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.2%).
Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMacedonianEcuadorian
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Poor
33.3%

Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 87.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 12.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.1%).
Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMacedonianEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.3%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.5%

Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 69.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.1%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricMacedonianEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.8%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.4%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.7%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.39%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Macedonian vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricMacedonianEcuadorian
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.3%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Fair
3.1%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%