South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
South American Indian
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
South American Indians
Ecuadorians
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in South American Indian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,413,924 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.205% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 204.8 Ecuadorians.
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $54,958, a difference of 13.2%), median family income ($103,624 compared to $95,114, a difference of 8.9%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $53,911, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $39,117, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($46,952 compared to $45,214, a difference of 3.8%).
Income Metric | South American Indian | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,206 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Good $103,624 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,446 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,952 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,508 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,019 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,979 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,497 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,171 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,215 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 22.9% |
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 25.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.1%), single female poverty (20.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Poverty Metric | South American Indian | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Fair 12.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Fair 11.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.1% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Good 20.6% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.3% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.9% | Tragic 14.9% |
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.1%).
Unemployment Metric | South American Indian | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.6% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
Labor Participation Metric | South American Indian | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 82.3% |
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.49%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.62%).
Family Structure Metric | South American Indian | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.26 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Excellent 2.3% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.7% | Poor 33.3% |
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 88.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 13.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | South American Indian | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.0% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.3%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.76%).
Education Level Metric | South American Indian | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 92.0% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.5% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.0% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.4% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.3% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.9% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Disability Metric | South American Indian | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.1% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |