South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

South American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

South American Indians

Ecuadorians

Average
Poor
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in South American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,413,924 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.205% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 204.8 Ecuadorians.
South American Indian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $54,958, a difference of 13.2%), median family income ($103,624 compared to $95,114, a difference of 8.9%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $53,911, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $39,117, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($46,952 compared to $45,214, a difference of 3.8%).
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricSouth American IndianEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,206
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Good
$103,624
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,446
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Good
$46,952
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,508
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,019
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,979
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,497
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,171
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,215
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
22.9%

South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 25.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.1%), single female poverty (20.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricSouth American IndianEcuadorian
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
14.9%

South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.1%).
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSouth American IndianEcuadorian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%

South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSouth American IndianEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
82.3%

South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.49%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.62%).
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSouth American IndianEcuadorian
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Poor
33.3%

South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 88.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 13.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.9%).
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSouth American IndianEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Tragic
4.5%

South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.3%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.76%).
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricSouth American IndianEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.5%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.0%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.3%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.9%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
South American Indian vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricSouth American IndianEcuadorian
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.1%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%