New Zealander vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
New Zealander
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
New Zealanders
Ecuadorians
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in New Zealander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,167,196 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.006% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 2,006.4 Ecuadorians.
New Zealander vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $54,958, a difference of 22.5%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $95,114, a difference of 21.1%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $53,911, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $39,117, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $45,214, a difference of 13.3%).
Income Metric | New Zealander | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,575 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,230 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,146 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,246 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,199 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,446 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,294 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,085 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,286 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,333 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 22.9% |
New Zealander vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 50.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.78%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.3%).
Poverty Metric | New Zealander | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Poor 13.2% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 14.9% |
New Zealander vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.3%).
Unemployment Metric | New Zealander | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
New Zealander vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.41%).
Labor Participation Metric | New Zealander | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 82.3% |
New Zealander vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.94%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (62.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | New Zealander | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.9% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Poor 33.3% |
New Zealander vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 123.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 45.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 44.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | New Zealander | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Tragic 4.5% |
New Zealander vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 76.8%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 71.7%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | New Zealander | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.3% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
New Zealander vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Disability Metric | New Zealander | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |