Creek vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Creek
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Creek
Ecuadorians
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Creek Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,454,973 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 55.8 Ecuadorians.
Creek vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $91,574, a difference of 22.4%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $82,070, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,911, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $54,958, a difference of 5.8%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $51,596, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $45,214, a difference of 14.0%).
Income Metric | Creek | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,546 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,560 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,715 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,648 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,594 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,437 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,371 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,847 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $78,960 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,949 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Creek vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 36.2%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 34.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 5.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.1%).
Poverty Metric | Creek | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.8% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.4% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.8% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.9% |
Creek vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Creek | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Creek vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Creek | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.1% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.0% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 82.3% |
Creek vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 22.7%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Creek | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.3% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Poor 46.0% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.6% | Poor 33.3% |
Creek vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 192.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 61.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 18.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 55.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Creek | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.3% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Creek vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 80.3%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Creek | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.2% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.9% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Creek vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 74.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 58.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.0%).
Disability Metric | Creek | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.4% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.5% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |