Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Native/Alaskan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Natives/Alaskans

Ecuadorians

Tragic
Poor
1,140
SOCIAL INDEX
9.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
321st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Native/Alaskan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,238,371 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 8.2 Ecuadorians.
Native/Alaskan Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $41,958, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $91,574, a difference of 21.0%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $82,070, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $54,958, a difference of 5.5%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $53,911, a difference of 13.0%).
Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricNative/AlaskanEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,279
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Tragic
$80,908
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,879
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,896
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,775
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,806
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,704
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$75,647
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$79,816
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,081
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.6%
Exceptional
22.9%

Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 57.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 41.4%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 16.1%).
Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricNative/AlaskanEcuadorian
Poverty
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
20.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
25.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
24.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
19.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
28.2%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.4%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.6%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
14.9%

Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNative/AlaskanEcuadorian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.2%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
11.5%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.5%

Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.6%).
Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNative/AlaskanEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.6%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.9%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.3%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.2%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
78.9%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.1%
Tragic
82.3%

Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.4%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 29.2%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.050%), currently married (42.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (66.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNative/AlaskanEcuadorian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.45
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
43.0%
Poor
33.3%

Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 116.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 83.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.8%).
Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNative/AlaskanEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.5%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.8%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.0%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
4.5%

Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 40.9%), bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 34.4%), and professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (87.7% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.43%), high school diploma (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and 11th grade (90.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.66%).
Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricNative/AlaskanEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.7%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.6%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.9%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.9%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.9%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 77.7%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 67.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 12.0%).
Native/Alaskan vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricNative/AlaskanEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.4%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
53.1%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.6%