Pima vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,511,773 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 40.2 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $41,958, a difference of 36.9%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $82,070, a difference of 29.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $93,739, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,911, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $54,958, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 76.3%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 75.2%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 118.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 88.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 75.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 54.7%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 76.2%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 61.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 10.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 56.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 52.5%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 51.3%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.61%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 63.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 51.1%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.0%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.0%).