Ugandan vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,201,645 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.296. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.097% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to a decrease of 96.8 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($106,541 compared to $95,114, a difference of 12.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $54,958, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $93,739, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $39,117, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,667 compared to $91,574, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 32.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.8%), births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and family households (61.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.36%), married-couple households (43.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 99.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.6%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 44.2%), and professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.4%).