Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Ecuadorians
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,753,821 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.760. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.169% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 168.8 Ecuadorians.
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $41,958, a difference of 38.7%), median household income ($61,663 compared to $82,070, a difference of 33.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $91,574, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $54,958, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $39,117, a difference of 17.8%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 89.3%), male poverty (22.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 80.5%), and poverty (24.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 21.6%), single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 33.4%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 39.8%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 14.9% |
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 65.3%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 64.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Tragic 82.3% |
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 60.2%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 49.8%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.77%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (67.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Poor 33.3% |
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 48.4%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 44.9%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 44.2%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 10th grade (90.1% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and 9th grade (92.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.75%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 100.0%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 66.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 19.7%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.6% |