Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Ecuadorians

Tragic
Poor
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,753,821 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.760. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.169% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 168.8 Ecuadorians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $41,958, a difference of 38.7%), median household income ($61,663 compared to $82,070, a difference of 33.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $91,574, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $54,958, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $39,117, a difference of 17.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
22.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 89.3%), male poverty (22.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 80.5%), and poverty (24.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 21.6%), single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 33.4%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 39.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamEcuadorian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
14.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 65.3%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 64.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamEcuadorian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
6.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
82.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 60.2%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 49.8%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.77%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (67.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamEcuadorian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Poor
33.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 48.4%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
4.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 44.9%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 44.2%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 10th grade (90.1% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and 9th grade (92.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.75%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 100.0%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 66.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 19.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%