Laotian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Ecuadorians
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,133,464 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 12.9 Ecuadorians.
Laotian vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $54,958, a difference of 20.6%), median family income ($112,859 compared to $95,114, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $93,739, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $53,911, a difference of 0.85%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $39,117, a difference of 7.7%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $45,214, a difference of 11.3%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Laotian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 49.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.58%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.5%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.9% |
Laotian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Laotian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 82.3% |
Laotian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.5%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Poor 33.3% |
Laotian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 151.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 65.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 16.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 39.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Laotian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.1%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 33.8%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.78%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Laotian vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.28%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |