Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tlingit-Haida
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tlingit-Haida

Ecuadorians

Average
Poor
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Tlingit-Haida Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,724,546 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to a decrease of 27.5 Ecuadorians.
Tlingit-Haida Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,922 compared to $54,958, a difference of 14.5%), median family income ($101,092 compared to $95,114, a difference of 6.3%), and wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,468 compared to $45,214, a difference of 0.56%), median female earnings ($39,513 compared to $39,117, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,987 compared to $91,574, a difference of 1.5%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricTlingit-HaidaEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,516
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,092
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,968
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,468
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,409
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,513
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,914
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,987
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,417
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,922
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Exceptional
22.9%

Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 67.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 62.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 0.42%), single female poverty (21.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 4.0%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricTlingit-HaidaEcuadorian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Good
10.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.6%
Tragic
14.9%

Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 141.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.6%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.48%), male unemployment (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTlingit-HaidaEcuadorian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
20.7%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.9%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%

Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 29.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.45%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTlingit-HaidaEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.5%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.9%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.5%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
82.3%

Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.3%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 3.3%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.1%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTlingit-HaidaEcuadorian
Family Households
Tragic
61.6%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.2%
Poor
33.3%

Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 126.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 53.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 32.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.4%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTlingit-HaidaEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.9%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
4.5%

Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 103.5%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and college, under 1 year (65.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricTlingit-HaidaEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.8%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 93.0%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.0%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.2%).
Tlingit-Haida vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricTlingit-HaidaEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.1%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.6%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%