Immigrants from Asia vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,231,442 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($118,291 compared to $95,114, a difference of 24.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $93,739, a difference of 24.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $54,958, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $53,911, a difference of 4.6%), median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $39,117, a difference of 13.0%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 50.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 38.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.1%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.4%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.5%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 109.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 51.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 34.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 44.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 66.3%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 40.5%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.6%).