Fijian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,728,969 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.493. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.078% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 77.8 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $91,574, a difference of 14.5%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $41,958, a difference of 14.4%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $51,596, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.010%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $54,958, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $53,911, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 33.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 31.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.75%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and poverty (13.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 51.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 48.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 28.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.9%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 139.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 75.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 16.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 37.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 58.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 36.0%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 33.9%), and doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.2% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and 11th grade (90.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.5%).