Swiss vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,796,360 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 0.1 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 30.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $54,958, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $93,739, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,315 compared to $45,214, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $39,117, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,511 compared to $91,574, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 53.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 52.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (17.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 37.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.9%), married-couple households (49.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and currently married (49.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 189.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 73.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 18.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 45.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 63.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 93.4%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 49.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.3%).