Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,210,834 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.327% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia corresponds to an increase of 327.1 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($46,187 compared to $53,911, a difference of 16.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,355 compared to $54,958, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,952 compared to $39,117, a difference of 2.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,450 compared to $91,574, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($47,704 compared to $45,214, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 41.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 32.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.080%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and poverty (13.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.4%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 2.1%), currently married (44.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 121.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 83.7%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 59.6%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.1%).