Turkish vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,744,747 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.120% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 119.8 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($121,202 compared to $95,114, a difference of 27.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $93,739, a difference of 25.7%), and per capita income ($52,391 compared to $41,958, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $53,911, a difference of 0.66%), median female earnings ($44,695 compared to $39,117, a difference of 14.3%), and median earnings ($53,919 compared to $45,214, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 56.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 50.8%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.9%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 30.5%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.4%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 94.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 13.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 82.8%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 65.3%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.1%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.4%).