Menominee vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Menominee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavian
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBelarusBelgiumBelizeBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemen
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Menominee

Ecuadorians

Fair
Poor
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Menominee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,901,593 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Menominee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.980. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.433% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Menominee corresponds to a decrease of 433.1 Ecuadorians.
Menominee Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Menominee vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Menominee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,903 compared to $93,739, a difference of 21.9%), per capita income ($34,578 compared to $41,958, a difference of 21.3%), and median male earnings ($42,581 compared to $51,596, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.87%), householder income over 65 years ($51,719 compared to $54,958, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,907 compared to $53,911, a difference of 12.5%).
Menominee vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricMenomineeEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$34,578
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,563
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Tragic
$68,423
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Tragic
$37,884
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,581
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,894
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,907
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$79,358
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$76,903
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,719
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
22.9%

Menominee vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Menominee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 49.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 48.6%), and single male poverty (17.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and female poverty (17.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 15.1%).
Menominee vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricMenomineeEcuadorian
Poverty
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.3%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
17.7%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
27.8%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
37.1%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
14.9%

Menominee vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Menominee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (10.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 87.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 52.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and male unemployment (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Menominee vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMenomineeEcuadorian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
6.5%

Menominee vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Menominee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 5.4%).
Menominee vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMenomineeEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.6%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.3%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.9%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.7%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.2%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.7%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Tragic
82.3%

Menominee vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Menominee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 76.6%), births to unmarried women (51.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 53.6%), and single mother households (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.37%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.53%).
Menominee vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMenomineeEcuadorian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.30
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.3%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.1%
Poor
33.3%

Menominee vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 93.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 31.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 22.2%).
Menominee vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMenomineeEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
4.5%

Menominee vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Menominee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 52.3%), master's degree (10.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 37.3%), and bachelor's degree (27.3% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Menominee vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricMenomineeEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.0%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.6%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.2%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Menominee vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 110.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 49.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.3%).
Menominee vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricMenomineeEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.4%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.3%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.8%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.6%