Hmong vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Ecuadorians
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,563,119 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.132% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 132.3 Ecuadorians.
Hmong vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 20.9%), median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $39,117, a difference of 10.2%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $41,958, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $54,958, a difference of 2.5%), median family income ($91,296 compared to $95,114, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $93,739, a difference of 6.4%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Hmong vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 36.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 14.9% |
Hmong vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 59.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Hmong vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 82.3% |
Hmong vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 20.0%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.13%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Hmong vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 119.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 37.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 4.5% |
Hmong vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and college, under 1 year (63.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Hmong vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.7%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.97%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |