Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sri Lankan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sri Lankans

Ecuadorians

Good
Poor
7,460
SOCIAL INDEX
72.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
116th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Sri Lankan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,013,841 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.462. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Ecuadorians.
Sri Lankan Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,201 compared to $54,958, a difference of 16.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,270 compared to $93,739, a difference of 15.5%), and median family income ($108,234 compared to $95,114, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $53,911, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($40,496 compared to $39,117, a difference of 3.5%), and per capita income ($44,014 compared to $41,958, a difference of 4.9%).
Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricSri LankanEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Average
$44,014
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,234
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,093
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,040
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,136
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,496
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,470
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,960
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,270
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,201
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Exceptional
22.9%

Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 40.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.1%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and single female poverty (19.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 12.9%).
Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricSri LankanEcuadorian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.7%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.4%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.9%

Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.8%).
Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSri LankanEcuadorian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%

Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.66%).
Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSri LankanEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.9%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
82.3%

Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.9%), births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.7%).
Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSri LankanEcuadorian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.7%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.9%
Poor
33.3%

Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 199.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 88.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 18.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 67.6%).
Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSri LankanEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.5%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.0%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
4.5%

Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.0%), college, under 1 year (65.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and college, 1 year or more (59.4% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 3rd grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricSri LankanEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.2%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.2%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.67%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricSri LankanEcuadorian
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.5%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%