Luxembourger vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Luxembourgers
Ecuadorians
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Luxembourger Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,165,526 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 15.8 Ecuadorians.
Luxembourger vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.7%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $95,114, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $54,958, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $39,117, a difference of 2.0%), median household income ($86,418 compared to $82,070, a difference of 5.3%), and median earnings ($47,640 compared to $45,214, a difference of 5.4%).
Income Metric | Luxembourger | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,663 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,183 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,418 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,640 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,300 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,891 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,379 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,237 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,536 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,967 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Luxembourger vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 67.8%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 62.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.7%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.9%).
Poverty Metric | Luxembourger | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.4% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 14.9% |
Luxembourger vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Luxembourger | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Luxembourger vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 44.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Luxembourger | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.7% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.9% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 45.3% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.0% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.4% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Luxembourger vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.5%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Luxembourger | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.3% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.4% | Poor 33.3% |
Luxembourger vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 324.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 21.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 40.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 48.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Luxembourger | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.1% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Luxembourger vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 86.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.8%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Luxembourger | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.3% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.7% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.1% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.8% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Luxembourger vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.95%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Disability Metric | Luxembourger | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.8% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |